Author: CREDNB

Seniors for Climate, a Canada-wide movement of concerned older adults, invites you to an Earth Day Rally at the Legislature, 706 Queen Street, Fredericton on Tuesday, April 22, from noon to 2 pm.

At this action-packed gathering, we’ll hear from climate and community leaders, connect with grassroots groups taking positive social and climate action, listen to great music, and shout out loudly for our politicians to stop the burning of fossil fuels and move rapidly to clean, affordable, and reliable renewable energy. Later is Too Late!

At 11:30 am just before the Rally, join us in front of Fredericton City Hall, 397 Queen Street, to hear the Mayor proclaim April 22 as Earth Day in Fredericton at 11:45, then make your own way to the Legislature. You are permitted to carry signs. Share this message with 10 friends, youth to seniors, and invite them to share with 10 friends, and so on. If everybody shares, we could see 1,000 people! 

Come, bring a friend, bring signs and lend your voice.

Recently, Point Lepreau has been scrutinized for costs that could reach $294 million for its 249-day outage, its contribution to about three-quarters of NB Power’s nearly $5.4 billion debt, and whether it should be shut down. Missing from discussion, however, are the reactor’s tritium emissions and the health hazard they pose.

All CANDU reactors like Point Lepreau use heavy water to sustain a chain reaction to produce steam that drives a turbine to generate electricity, and to prevent the core from overheating and melting down. Over time, tritium, or radioactive hydrogen, builds up in the heavy water. To reduce the risk of exposing nuclear workers and the public to increasing radiation levels, the heavy water from the moderator system must be treated or replaced.

NB Power was asked if Point Lepreau’s heavy water had ever been replaced or treated. Through email, Kathleen Duguay, manager, community affairs and nuclear regulatory protocol at Point Lepreau responded as follows: “The Station has not undergone a replacement of heavy water since the reactor began operations.”

This commentary by Ann McAllister was published in the New Brunswick Telegraph Journal on March 1, 2025. To read more click HERE.

Ann McAllister, a retired teacher, participated as an intervenor in the relicensing hearing for the Point Lepreau Nuclear Generating Station held by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission in May 2022.

Canadians are heading to the polls on April 28th, in a moment when we’re facing the human & economic costs of both climate change and the trade war.

Climate Action Network and civil society groups from coast to coast are calling on parties not to sacrifice Canada’s climate progress to Donald Trump’s destructive agenda during this election & beyond.

See Climate Action Network full statement with quotes from civil society by clicking HERE. CRED-NB has signed onto this statement.

Pour le français cliquez ici.

Today, climate-concerned organizations from across Canada published an open letter to Mark Carney, calling on the newly elected Prime Minister-designate to future-proof the Canadian economy by putting forward climate-aligned finance policy.  

The letter, signed by 57 organizations and individuals, calls on Canada’s next Prime Minister to make good on his record of inviting financial actors to the climate problem-solving table and take the necessary next step of championing legislation that legally requires their alignment with a stable, climate-safe future ahead of an upcoming federal election.    

See full press release HERE.

(La version française suit)

From the SMRs Education Task Force: Bulletin number 15 • March 2025

Toxic radioactive waste is expensive to clean up. Canada’s contract to clean up its legacy waste is worth billions for a three-company consortium: Canada’s AtkinsRéalis and Texas-based Fluor and Jacobs. The two American companies run nuclear weapons facilities in the U.S. and U.K. in addition to their Canadian nuclear interests.

Parliament’s payment to the consortium last year was $1.3 billion. The annual payments have risen each year of the 10-year contract that will end in September 2025. The consortium operates “Canadian Nuclear Laboratories” (CNL) in a “Government-owned, Contractor-operated” (GoCo) arrangement with Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL).

The U.K. abandoned GoCo contracts because of exorbitant costs and poor value for money. Under Canada’s GoCo contract, AECL owns lands, buildings, and radioactive waste, and the three-company consortium operates AECL’s sites.

When the Harper government issued the 10-year GoCo contract during the 2015 federal election period, they said AECL lacked the ability to clean up Canada’s multi-billion radioactive waste liability dating to World War II and needed “private sector rigour.” From their billion-dollar annual payout, the three partner corporations take $237 million for “contractual expenses.” The salaries of 44 senior CNL managers, mostly Americans, average over $500,000 each.

Read more

---

Les entreprises américaines profitent des déchets radioactifs du Canada

De le groupe de travail sur l’éducation relative aux PRM : Bulletin numéro 15 • Mars 2025

Les déchets radioactifs toxiques sont coûteux à nettoyer. Le contrat du Canada pournettoyer ses déchets qui s’accumulent vaut des milliards pour un consortium de troisentreprises : AtkinsRéalis du Canada et Fluor and Jacobs, basées au Texas. Les deuxsociétés américaines exploitent des installations d’armement nucléaire aux États-Uniset au Royaume-Uni, en plus de leurs intérêts nucléaires canadiens.Le paiement du Parlement au consortium l’an dernier s’est élevé à 1,3 milliard dedollars. Les paiements annuels ont augmenté chaque année du contrat de 10 ans quise terminera en septembre 2025.

Le consortium exploite les « Laboratoires nucléaires canadiens » (LNC) dans le cadred’une entente avec Énergie atomique du Canada limitée (EACL) dite « GoCo(Government-owned, Contractor-operated » qui signifie que le gouvernement possèdel’organisme, mais que le consortium le gère.

Le Royaume-Uni a abandonné les contrats de GoCo en raison des coûts exorbitants etdu faible rapport qualité-prix. En vertu du contrat de GoCo du Canada, EACL estpropriétaire des terres, des bâtiments et des déchets radioactifs, et le consortium detrois sociétés exploite les sites d’EACL.

Lorsque le gouvernement Harper a publié le contrat de 10 ans pour la GoCo pendant lapériode des élections fédérales de 2015, il a déclaré qu’EACL n’avait pas la capacité denettoyer les déchets radioactifs du Canada qui représentent des milliards de dollars etqui datent de la Seconde Guerre mondiale et qu’elle devait faire preuve de « rigueur dusecteur privé ».

Sur leur versement annuel de 1 milliard de dollars, les trois sociétés partenairesprennent 237 millions de dollars pour des « dépenses contractuelles ». Les salaires de44 cadres supérieurs des LNC, pour la plupart américains, excèdent en moyenne500 000 $ chacun.

Lire plus

CRED-NB is an active member of Climate Action Network – Canada. A fellow network member, the Climate Emergency Unit, has started a new podcast called Break In Case of Emergency. So far it’s BC focused but we think they will have a lot of relevant information to share, especially since they have a Canadian perspective.

The podcast features urgent conversations about the crisis that connects us all. As global temperatures soar and communities face devastating climate disasters, they share conversations with frontline activists and organizers about what a true emergency response looks like—beyond government inaction, corporate greenwashing, and climate denial. Through critical analysis, storytelling, and radical imagination, they examine the systems of power that are blocking climate action and explore what’s required to build a movement for a just, livable planet.

Try a listen at https://www.climateemergencyunit.ca/podcast

By Jim Emberger – Special to Brunswick News – Published February 20, 2025

Threatening times, with rapidly changing events, inevitably produce two things. Public and media attention becomes focused on the turmoil and pace of immediate concerns, and longstanding issues, regardless of importance, are set aside.

Secondly, some corporate or financial interests will attempt to use the distraction to push profiteering schemes, especially unpopular ones.  This is sometimes known as “disaster capitalism.”

We see this today as Canada’s fossil fuel producers, and their political and media allies, respond to Donald Trump’s tariff threats by re-introducing the ideas of the Energy East bitumen pipeline and various shale gas/LNG projects.

These projects are now cloaked in patriotism, with their proponents cynically counting on the public’s anxiety and patriotic fervour to cloud its memory of the legitimate economic and environmental grounds for rejecting the projects originally.

Read more

Jim Emberger is the spokesperson for the New Brunswick Anti-Shale Gas Alliance (NBASGA). NBASGA is a CRED-NB Champion.

CRED-NB is a member of the SMR Information Task force that publishes regular bulletins send to federal and provincial legislators. This month the topic is reaching net zero without any new nuclear energy.

The nuclear industry claims that we cannot reach net zero emissions without nuclear because “base load” energy is required to provide reliable electricity “when the sun doesn’t shine and the wind doesn’t blow.” This is false. A recent study by the David Suzuki Foundation shows that Canada can reach net zero without any new nuclear energy.

Many countries have taken advantage of the advances in technology and the plummeting price of wind and solar energy and are on their way to a largely renewable energy grid. In 2022, almost 100% of the total electricity produced in ten countries, and between 50 and 100% in 64 countries, was from renewable energy: wind, water and solar.

Germany is a leader in Europe for both solar and wind generation growth. In the first nine months of 2024, renewable energy (largely from wind and solar) accounted for 59% of power generation. By April Germany had exceeded its target of total solar capacity for the entire year.

Many other countries are proving that we do not need nuclear energy to reach net zero, and Canada should be following their lead.

Read the full bulletin HERE.